We have already made great strides in addressing how
landscape evolution and the thaw lake cycle will potentially impact CO2
and CH4 fluxes, with an eye towards getting this information into
high-resolution climate models. It has been interesting this week to walk the
BEO and, when time permits, to consider how snowmelt and associated processes
might differ across the polygons that we are studying. What I have observed is
that the tops of the high-centered polygons do not have very deep layers of
snow and the snow that accumulates on them during the long winter seems to melt
first before melting on any of the other features in the landscape.
Scientists including Margaret Torn, Bryan Curtis, Melanie
Hahn, and others have not yet summarized all of their chamber-based
measurements of CO2 and CH4 flux from previous years at
this point, so I cannot be overly quantitative about this observation. However,
looking at our field sites, especially those in and among high-centered
polygons, I can imagine that the growing season is longer, soils are warmer,
albeit possibly dryer, and thus environmental conditions may result in different
rates and seasonal magnitudes of CO2 and CH4 flux from
these features. If so, then we need to incorporate this fine-scale information
into our models.